The wealth in this movie was distracting* but the acting was superb. I found some of the "hi-lar-ious" situations a bit forced, but still amusing and I liked how everything ended up. Question: Is it his charisma or would John Krasinski be as magnetic if he wasn't Jim from the Office?
poster from: http://www.impawards.com/2009/its_complicated_ver2.html
*as in, "Hmmmm. I'm guessing that house must be worth at least two million dollars. Now clearly she owned it when she and her husband were married, so she probably got it in the divorce, but how could she afford the upkeep? Her bakery/coffee shop seemed to be very busy, but one location can't possibly pull in that much, can it? Perhaps she has multiple locations? He is some sort of successful lawyer, but really do lawyers make that much? He has the swanky condo in the city and the fancy car, plus probably some sort of payments/loss of income due to the divorce, although that was more than a decade ago, so perhaps he has time to recover. And neither of them seem to work. And really, her already quite large kitchen isn't big enough? It's the size of my living room. If she's so busy, as alluded to, when does she have time to do all this cooking? Also, the daughter and son-in-law's home is huge! They are supposed to be in their 20s and this is California. How can they afford that? Are they lawyers too? Maybe there is a trust fund involved. Really, this all should be explained so I can concentrate on the story. Just a throwaway line like 'grandpa's cotton money provided all this' would do. Geez."
I still have not seen this. For some reason it doesn't appeal. Maybe the adultery parts...
ReplyDelete